Showing posts with label What we do. Show all posts
Showing posts with label What we do. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

What We Do: Architectural Acoustics: Reverberation time

One of the many things architects can consider in the design of buildings is architectural acoustics.
  • What is it?
    • Reverberation time is basically how "loud" a room or space is.  Specifically, the time (measured in seconds) that it takes for a certain noise level to drop 60 decibels (dB).  The 60 decibel drop is an arbitrary decision to standardize the measurement, but it is a relatively useful choice, given it is about the difference between an orchestra at full fortissimo and the background noise in a room.  
  • Why is it important?
    • Reverberation time contributes (or detracts) from the quality of a space in several ways, in different environments.  Here's a chart showing optimum reverberation times for various rooms.
      • The biggest difference (or at least the most recognized) is made in performing arts environments, one of our specialties.
        • In choral or lyrical instrumental performance environments, a long reverberation time  (like a cathedral) is desirable, stretching and blending the various sounds into one another, adding a great resonance to people's voices, making them sound better.  It's probably no coincidence that people tend to sing in the shower, usually the room with usually the longest reverberation time, due to usually having all hard finishes.
        • In lecture halls or spoken-word environments, a short reverberation time is desirable, as long reverberation times will blend the consonants together, making certain words hard to distinguish.  
        • In practice rooms and rehearsal halls, many musicians prefer to have short-resonance spaces, so as to be able to hear themselves accurately, without the embellishment and "sugar-coating" of a well-designed hall.  (Though, some of us enjoy practicing in reflective stairwells, using the reverberation to fool ourselves into thinking we sound much better than we actually are.) 
      • Outside of performance buildings, reverberation times still make a difference:
  • How do we do it?
    • Reverberation time is usually measured in the field by playing a sound, stopping it, then recording how long it takes for the sound level to drop 60 decibels.  It can, however, be calculated ahead of time by taking the volume of the room (multiplied by a constant), and dividing it by the sum of the total Sabins of absorption in the room.   See here for more detailed information.
    • A sabin, named for the Harvard acoustic researcher who first researched reverberation times, is a measurement of absorption, whose units are curiously measured in area (m^2, or sqft.)  However, to be a useful measurement in sabins, the area is multiplied by a coefficient of how much sound it absorbs.  For example, a square meter (or square foot for imperial units) of open window reflects no sound, and so have a perfect coefficient of 1, and would be measured as one sabin.  Something of the same size that reflects a quarter of the sound back would then be 0.75 sabins.   
    • Notably, since materials will absorb sound differently at different frequencies, a standardized metric, called the Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) exists to test a material at four common octave bands; at 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; (Approx Middle B4, B5, B6, and B7) and average performance between the four.  Typical NRCs vary from 0.70-0.90 for high-absorption acoustic ceilings, to 0.05 for glass, brick, or gypsum board. 
    • These calculations can also be done in reverse, where we take a room of a desired size and desired reverberation time, and calculate out the required absorption needed, which we can then incorporate into the design of the room.   Most projects we do this ourselves, but in highly sensitive cases like music schools and performance halls, we will partner with an acoustical consultant to get it just right.
    • In many cases, the equations can be simplified, and a good reverberation time can be obtained by simply selecting a good ceiling and floor finish.
    • However, in more specialized cases, we often need to add acoustical panels around or in the space, both to absorb sound, and to break up any strong echoes  We also sometimes add movable curtains that can be opened to allow the acoustical qualities of the room to be changed as desired. All of these elements need to be carefully placed, both to work with the acoustic geometry of the rooms, as well as to fit within a coherent room design.
  • When in the process do we do it?
    • Early in the design process, we will take into account the desired volumes of spaces, and select a ceiling and a ceiling height that works for most of the simple spaces
    • Later in the design process, for any particularly complicated or demanding spaces, we will look into any necessary additional acoustic panels or elements, and incorporate them into the design of the spaces.
  • Where are some good examples that we've worked on?
    • Casper College
      • At Casper College, we worked closely with our acoustical consultants to properly balance the acoustics of all the major spaces.   The required acoustic panels were treated as a design opportunity, helping to give character to the various spaces.
      • The main concert hall was made up of glass-fiber-reinforced gypsum panels on the ceiling and walls to evoke the windswept plains of the area, while diffusing the sounds throughout the hall, with absorbing panels at the rear.   There are also absorptive curtains  that can be deployed in front of these diffusive panels that will allow the users to controls the acoustics of the space.
      • In the instrumental and choral rehearsal halls, the adjustable acoustic curtains were hidden by pilasters that, along with the curved acoustic diffuser wall panels, also give detail and a human scale to the large space.  
      • At the percussion rehearsal hall, absorptive wall panels were placed both low and high, to avoid reflective standing waves and flutter echoes, while the mid-height diffusive acoustic wall panels were woven together with both absorptive and diffusive concrete blocks, to accomodate the deeper tones of a percussion suite.  They were carefully placed on the walls as an expression of the common basic rhythms that percussionists play, while additional glass-fiber-reinforced panels from the main auditorium were hung in the space to diffuse the sound from below.
    • Mimosa Park Elementary
      • At  Mimosa Park Elementary we preemptively addressed acoustical concerns about an overly-loud cafeteria space by spraying a acoustical treatment onto the ceiling, adding acoustical panels on all walls, and adding hanging acoustic panels in the center of the space.  This was done early enough in the design and construction process that all of these elements were folded into the coherent design of the cafeteria, instead of tacked on afterwards.
    • JB Martin Gymnasium
      • At JB Martin Gym, we were specifically tasked with fixing the acoustics of an existing gymnasium, that was far too "loud" a space to be useful.   Nearly all speech was unintelligible, even through the loudspeakers, and being in the space during a loud athletic event was almost unbearable.  HMS remedied the situation by applying a sprayed acoustic ceiling to the entirety of the gym ceiling, as well as placing acoustic wall panels at the perimeter, solving the school's problem, even with an increased capacity of the gym.
Overall, reverberation time is one of the many factors that affect a user's perception of a space, and is therefore only one of the many factors we take into account for the design spaces and buildings.


Wednesday, September 2, 2015

FAQ: How Much Does A New Rehearsal Hall Cost: Budgeting For Planning Music Rehearsal Facilities


Pdf version is downloadable here

Casper College Instrumental Rehearsal Hall
Across the country, music educators are making do with the facilities they inherited, often with their programs hampered by the limitations of these spaces.  Renovating or building new music facilities is an inherently complicated exercise, but it is one of our specialties at HMS Architects.  At the risk of oversimplification, here are some ballpark figures based on our current and previous projects, to educate the educators on what is involved in planning a music rehearsal facility.

Detail level of estimates

Estimates typically increase in detail level as the design progresses, and could include costs by rough overall building square footage numbers, room-by-room square footage numbers, or even detailed accounting of every element at the end of design.  However, at the end of the day, all of this is done to estimate the final bids of several contractors who have their own individual methodologies and pressures that affect their bids. 
However, for the purposes of planning projects some years in the future, here are some rough figures and considerations.

Building Efficiency

Building efficiency measures the net usable area in relation to the more commonly used gross overall building area.  This building efficiency varies by building type, but in our experience, music facilities have historically tended to be particularly inefficient, around the 40-60% range.  This means that about half of the overall building area is devoted to non-programmed spaces, including walls, chases, corridors, stairs, restrooms, janitor’s closets, mechanical rooms, etc.

It is worth noting that the building efficiency numbers will rise and fall based on which spaces count as programmed.   Here we are using one of the least forgiving definitions, for simplicity, but it is not uncommon to count restrooms or janitorial areas as programmed spaces, and that would therefore artificially bump up the building efficiency.
For reference, above is a color-coded first floor plan of the HMS-designed Casper College School of Music.   The overall area is shown in grey and black, while only the red areas are programmed spaces, only 56% of the total area, but relatively high for a performing arts facility.  This particular floor is 27,000 SF, and with the second floor above it, the building was 35,000 SF total. The cost of construction was about $12.7 million, in 2012 dollars, a relatively cost-effective $370 per square foot. It is also worth noting that this building includes a performance hall, which is outside the scope of these estimates.
Music facilities tend to be relatively inefficient for many reasons, including increased acoustical wall thickness, wider hallways, etc., that are uniquely necessary for music facilities.   In addition, this ratio will vary based on many factors, including room quantity, site constraints, program or adjacency constraints, and the skill of the architect.  However, all of these factors will historically affect the ballpark 50% efficiency value (and therefore size of the building, and the price) by about 10%. 

For example, if a department is looking for a 6,000 square foot (SF) rehearsal hall, with 3,200 SF of storage, and eight 100 SF practice rooms to round it out, it would add up to 10,000 SF net, but the building may end up being approximately 20,000 SF gross, or about 100 by 200 feet.  Conversely, if someone mentions a 20,000 SF building, there is probably only 10,000 SF of usable space in it.

Cost per Square Foot

The most common comparison of building cost is cost per square foot, usually measured by construction cost divided by gross square footage.  Based on our previous projects, and checked against other music facilities, in 2015, we expect the cost per square foot to be approximately $300-$600 per square foot in 2015 dollars for music facilities.  For the purposes of this article, we will assume $500 per square foot as a reasonable, safe, and round value.  This figure is considerably higher than most building types.  This is a result of the specialty construction necessary to address the acoustic needs of these spaces, including acoustic treatments, theatrical and recording equipment, structure for large open spaces, heavy double walls, acoustically separate structures, and sometimes even entirely separate mechanical systems within the same building.

Cost of Construction (Hard Costs)

The cost of construction is the most common cost referenced.  It is estimated by the architect, but the final cost is the actual bid cost by the contractor who will construct the building.   This price will include all of the labor, materials and profit involved in the construction of the building.
Going back to our example, at $500 per square foot, that 20,000 SF building would be approximately $10M in construction cost.

Soft Costs

This includes furniture, removable equipment, permitting, surveyors, construction testing, and professional design fees for architecture and engineering.   This cost will vary, but is usually about an additional 25% of the cost of construction. 
In our example, that would come out to an additional $2.5M.

Total Project Cost

The total project cost contains the hard cost of construction, combined with the other project soft costs. 
Going back again to our example, the project’s $10M construction cost would translate to a $12.5M overall project cost.

Inflation adjustments

It’s also important to account for inflation and cost increases when planning for future projects.  Construction is subject to market forces, and while there is some volatility, things tend to cost more in the future.
Our example $12.5M 2015 project would have cost only $11.4M only 5 years ago, in 2010, and only 10.2M 10 years ago, in 2005.  Historically, this has amounted to  2-3% a year, or a 10% increase in all costs for every 5 years, but any year could be different.   The data we have has shown an annual increase of 3-8 % in both 2013 and 2014.  This trend is expected to continue at 3-8%, depending on location, in 2015

Common Spaces

Below is a chart showing the approximate costs of common spaces.  Not every building will need every space, and certain programs may be able to easily squeeze into smaller spaces than the full-sized theoretical optimum.  Usually, programs grow from existing spaces, and can re-purpose those spaces for new uses that fit.  Every program, every site, and every need will be different per project, and every building should be carefully tailored by knowledgeable experts to meet those needs, which is why we are here.  However, these numbers should be enough to allow for some long term planning for the future of your music programs.

(As reprinted in the program for the 2015 annual conference of the International Council of Fine Arts Deans)
Pdf version is downloadable here
More about HMS-designed Performing Arts Projects
More about HMS-designed Educational Projects
More about Casper College School of Music